Unpublished Disposition, 880 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1987)Annotate this Case
Charles STRINGER, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SAN FRANCISCO CITY & COUNTY; S.F. Department of SocialServices, S.F. Public Defender; S.F. City Attorney, DianneFeinstein, Mayor; Jeff Brown; Lou Randolph; Drew Priddy;Lowell H. Suchermann; Carroll Collins, III; Arthur Wise;Aristela Huet; Charles Haines; Edna Henley; S.F. SuperiorCourt; Gregory Bonfillio; Chuck Stolpe; Barbra Kleckner;Virginia Solveson; Donald King; Daniel Weinstein; JohnErtola; Roy Wonder; Isabelle H. Grant, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted* June 28, 1989.Decided July 18, 1989.
Before MERRILL, EUGENE A. WRIGHT AND BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Henderson in his order of November 2, 1987 granting the defendants' motion to dismiss. The order cited controlling Ninth Circuit authority, Coats v. Woods, 819 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1987), and Peterson v. Babbit, 708 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1983).
There was no error in denying the appointment of counsel or the denial of plaintiff's motion for continuance.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4