United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Reynold Nicewonger, Defendant-appellant, 875 F.2d 317 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 875 F.2d 317 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted March 16, 1989. Decided May 8, 1989

James Reynold Nicewonger, appellant pro se.

Susan Moss Ringler Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


James Reynold Nicewonger appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nicewonger, C/A No. 86-3451-HAR, CR No. 84-431-HAR (D. Md. Feb. 2, 1987). We deny Nicewonger's motions for preparation of a transcript at government expense, to supplement the record, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.