United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Calvin Alexander Holmes, A/k/a Frog, Defendant-appellant, 875 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 875 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted March 21, 1989. Decided May 1, 1989

Calvin Alexander Holmes, appellant pro se.

Thomas J. Ashcraft, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Calvin Alexander Holmes appeals from the district court's order denying Holmes' Fed.R.Cr.P. 35(a) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Holmes, CR No. 88-30-ST (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

Our holding in this case does not preclude Holmes from filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition raising this claim after his direct appeal has been finally decided