Jamie Fonseca, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Norma G. Gluckstern; Myra J. Keel; Frank Eisenberg;francis Carney; Standley A. Fishbein; Robert Norris;kathern Mahlin; Patricia A. Reuppert; H. Joseph Meyer;judy Ricci; William J. Smith; Robert Eggleston; Howardharris; Ronald Bridges; Wesley Horney, Defendants-appellees, 873 F.2d 1438 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseJamie Fonseca, appellant pro se.
Richard M. Kastendieck; Maureen Mullen Dove (Office of the Attorney General of Maryland); Paul Frederick Newhouse (Eccleston and Seidler), for appellees.
Before SPROUSE, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Fonseca appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fonseca v. Gluckstern, C/A 87-1936-JFM (D. Md. March 21, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
