Unpublished Dispositionmichigan National Bank, a National Banking Association,plaintiff-appellee, v. Herbert Tanner, Defendant-appellant,mathew Durda, Robert Henry, Defendants, 872 F.2d 1026 (6th Cir. 1989)

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Plaintiff Michigan National Bank sought enforcement of a settlement agreement stemming from a civil RICO action, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq. The district court granted enforcement and the instant appeal followed. The parties have briefed the issues, defendant Tanner proceeding pro se.

Upon consideration, we find the district court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Fed. R. Civ. P. 52. The record contains ample evidentiary material from which to conclude Michigan National Bank and Tanner agreed to settle the civil RICO action on the terms as found by the district court. Brock v. Scheuner Corp., 841 F.2d 151, 154 (6th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.