Troussant Delano Lett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Dolinger, Petersburg City Jail, Defendants-appellees, 870 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseTroussant Delano Lett, appellant pro se.
Dana B. Sykes, Hirschler, Fleischer, Weinberg, Cox & Allen), for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Troussant Delano Lett appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm* on the reasoning of the district court. Lett v. Dolinger, C/A No. 88-419-R (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Lett's motion for the appointment of counsel in light of our view of the issue presented. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
