Unpublished Dispositionnational Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. B and R Coal Co., Inc., Respondent, 869 F.2d 1491 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 869 F.2d 1491 (6th Cir. 1989) Feb. 17, 1989

Before RALPH B. GUY and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge* .

ORDER

This Court having on May 14, 1987, entered its judgment enforcing in full the backpay provision of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board, on June 30, 1988, issued its Supplemental Decision and Order fixing the amount of backpay due the discriminatees and having thereafter applied to this Court for summary entry of a supplemental judgment specifying the amount of backpay due:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court that Respondent, B and R Coal Co., Inc., Weeksbury, Kentucky, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, to make whole the discriminatees named below, by payment to them of the amounts following their names plus interest accrued to the date of payment to be computed in the manner prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded,1  until payment of all backpay due is made, less tax withholdings required by Federal and state laws:

George Branham $7,348.24 Hayden Burke 6,285.28 Dean Counts 6,285.28 Terry Johnson 13,046.59 Jesse Little 6,764.33 Jerry Johnson 4,648.12 Fon Martin 5,076.96 Claude Moore 6,285.28 Vincent Blevins 6,051.20 Jerry Hurt 6,285.28
 *

The Honorable Robert Holmes Bell, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

 1

In accordance with the decision in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB No. 181 (May 28, 1987), interest on and after January 1, 1987, shall be computed at the "short-term Federal rate" for the underpayment of taxes as set out in the 1986 amendment to 26 U.S.C. § 6621. Interest on amounts accrued prior to January 1, 1987 (the effective date of the 1986 amendment to 26 U.S.C. § 6621), shall be computed in accordance with Florida Steel Corp., 231 NLRB 651 (1977)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.