Unpublished Dispositionnational Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Taxicab Drivers Local No.327, Affiliated with International Brotherhood Ofteamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Andhelpers of America, Afl-cio, Respondent, 863 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 863 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1988) Nov. 25, 1988

Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

This cause was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) for the enforcement of a certain order issued by it against respondent, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Taxicab Drivers Local No. 327, affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO, its officers, agents, and representatives, on September 23, 1988, in a proceeding before the said Board numbered 26-CC-471-1, 26-CC-471-2, 26-CC-471-3, and 26-CC-472.

The Board's order of September 23, 1988, contained the following stipulation agreed to by the respondent:

The United States Court of Appeals for any appropriate Circuit may, upon application by the Board, enter its judgment enforcing the order of the Board in the form set forth....

Respondent waives all defenses to the entry of the judgment, including compliance with the Order of the Board, and its right to receive notice of the filing of an application for the entry of such judgment, provided that the judgment is in the words and figures set forth.... However, Respondent shall be required to comply with the affirmative provisions of the Board's Order after entry of the judgment only to the extent that it has not already done so.

Therefore, upon consideration of the record before us,

It is ORDERED that the Board's order hereby is enforced and that the respondent, its officers, agents, and representatives, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.