Ronald Rogers, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joseph Hamilton, G.e. Currie, Defendants-appellees, 862 F.2d 314 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseRonald Rogers, appellant pro se.
Before K.K. HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Rogers appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Hamilton, C/A No. 88-449-CRT (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
