United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Richard Paul Elliott, Defendant-appellant, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseRichard Paul Elliott, appellant pro se.
Charles P. Scheeler, Office of U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Paul Elliott appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Elliott's motion for summary judgment and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Elliott, CA-87-453-K; CR-85-318 (D. Md. July 28, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
