Anthony Crowell, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 857 F.2d 1468 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 857 F.2d 1468 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: June 28, 1988. Decided: Sept. 6, 1988

Anthony Crowell, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Anthony Crowell seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Murray, CA-87-538-N (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.* 

DISMISSED.

 *

Crowell's claim that there are erroneous facts in his psychological reports may be raised under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; however, Crowell must first comply with the procedures outlined in Paine v. Baker, 595 F.2d 197, 202-203 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 (1979). There is no indication Crowell has so complied