Isiah James, Ii, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William D. Leeke; Attorney General of South Carolina; Irabyrd Parnell; T.r. Mims; Mrs. J.l. Bonds,executrix of the Estate of J.l. Bonds,defendants- Appellees, 852 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseIsiah James, II, appellant pro se.
Thomas Rush Gottshall (Sinkler & Boyd), for appellees Parnell and Mims.
Thomas Rush Gottshall and D. Gene Rickenbaker, for appellee Bonds.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Isiah James, II, appeals from the district court's denial of his motion seeking relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. The district court found that James sought only to relitigate the issues previously decided against him. We agree and accordingly find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of the motion. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310 (4th Cir. 1982).
We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue has recently been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
