Unpublished Dispositiontahir Raheem, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 852 F.2d 1288 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The petitioner appeals pro se from the Tax Court's order dismissing his petition for review of a deficiency notice. 26 U.S.C. § 6213. The appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
The petitioner's Tax Court petition was filed beyond the 90 day time period required by 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a). The Tax Court dismissed the petition as untimely. Upon consideration, we agree with the conclusion of the Tax Court.
Accordingly, the order of the Tax Court is affirmed under Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, because the issues are not substantial and do not require oral argument.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
