Benjamin Anthony Joyner, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ernest Areheart; Preston Mckinstrict, Defendants-appellees, 849 F.2d 605 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBenjamin Anthony Joyner, appellant pro se.
Robert Peterson (South Carolina Department of Corrections), for appellee.
Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Joyner, a South Carolina inmate, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants failed to provide him protection from violence, in violation of the eighth amendment. The district court concluded that the defendants were, at most, merely negligent and granted judgment in their favor on the authority of Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 (1986).
We agree with the district court's conclusion that the evidence raised only an issue of negligence. We affirm its judgment on the ground that negligent conduct does not establish an eighth amendment violation. See Pressly v. Hutto, 816 F.2d 977 (4th Cir. 1987). See also Ruefly v. Landon, 825 F.2d 792 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
