Unpublished Dispositionjohn Alfred Duncombe, Ii, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James P. Murphy, and Ronald Shoemate, Defendants-appellees,charles Ellis, John Harkness, Kirk M. Kandle, Defendants, 848 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 848 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1988) March 31, 1988

Before KEITH, BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3) and 1986. The appeal has been referred to a panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the certified record and the parties' briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Plaintiff claimed the defendants conspired to deprive him of his liberty interest in keeping his prison job without procedural due process due to race discrimination.

Upon consideration, we affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in the order filed June 16, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.