Tyrone A. Williams, Petitioner-appellant, v. Maryland Parole Commission, Respondent-appellee, 848 F.2d 187 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseTyrone A. Williams, appellant pro se.
Karen Stakem Hornig, Ronald Mark Levitan, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief* pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is without merit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately developed in the record and because argument would not significantly aid our resolution of the issues presented. The judgment below is affirmed on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Maryland Parole Commission, C/A No. 87-1572-HM (D. Md. Feb. 4, 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Our determination of the merits of this appeal is unaffected by the characterization of the suit as a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or a civil rights suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellant is not entitled to relief under either statute. Failure to demonstrate exhaustion of state remedies in the district court does not necessitate remand. See Granberry v. Greer, 55 U.S.L.W. 4494, 4496 (U.S. Apr. 21, 1987) (No. 85-6790)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
