United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jorge Antonio Rodriguez, Defendant-appellant, 848 F.2d 186 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseJorge Antonio Rodriguez, appellant pro se.
Richard Wilcox Pierce, Assistant United States Attorney (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Jorge Antonio Rodriguez appeals the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). Our review of the record indicates that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez's motion. See United States v. Rosenthal, 673 F.2d 722 (4th Cir. 1982). We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Rodriguez's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
