Satish Bhaturia, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Exxon Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 848 F.2d 184 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseDecided: May 26, 1988
Satish Bhaturia, appellant pro se.
Sue C. Erwin (Sinkler & Boyd), William Boyd, James H. Lengel, for appellee.
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from his order denying relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Bhaturia v. Exxon Corporation, C/A No. 85-3047 (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
