Charles E. Hopkins, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 845 F.2d 1033 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 845 F.2d 1033 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Feb. 4, 1988

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, DAVIS and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


DECISION

The decision of the Merit SYstems Protection Board (board), Docket No. DA0831510049, affirming Office of Personnel Management's (OPM's) reconsideration decision denying Charles E. Hopkins' (Hopkins') request for an increase in the amount of his disability retirement annuity, is affirmed. Hopkins' request that this appeal be retransferred to the United States District Court is denied.

OPINION

The Eastern District of Arkansas dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies Hopkins' claim that discrimination was the cause of his removal by the Department of the Army, his former employer. The sole issue before this court is therefore the correctness of the board's decision affirming OPM's denial of Hopkins' request for an increased annuity. There being no discrimination issue involved in that decision of the board, this court has exclusive jurisdiction to review that decision, 5 U.S.C. §§ 7703(b) (1), (2) (1982); Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management, 470 U.S. 768, 795-96 (1985); Meehan v. United States Postal Service, 718 F.2d 1069, 1074 (Fed. Cir. 1983), and Hopkins' request for transfer must be denied.

We have been shown no basis for reversing the board's decision affirming OPM's denial of an increased annuity. See Lindahl, 470 U.S. at 791; Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 760 F.2d 244, 246 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Therefore, we must affirm.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.