Eli Florist Easterling, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of North Carolina; Attorney General of the State Ofnorth Carolina, Respondents-appellees, 842 F.2d 1290 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseEli Florist Easterling, appellant pro se.
Barry Steven McNeill, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Easterling v. North Carolina, CA-86-952-C-G (M.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1987).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
