Unpublished Dispositionmonte Mcconnico, Petitioner-appellant, v. George Henderson, Respondent-appellee, 840 F.2d 17 (6th Cir. 1988)

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and SPIEGEL, District Judge.^* 

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Petitioner filed this action for federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 attacking the constitutionality of a 1984 conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property valued over one hundred (100) dollars. The district court declined to issue the writ sought and this appeal followed. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues, petitioner proceeding pro se.

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion and order filed April 24, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.