Emjumo A. Kenyatta, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward Murray, Director, Ind. & Officially; Raymond M.muncy, Warden, Ind. & Officially; Patrick Gurney, Ind. &officially; Edward C. Morris, Ind. & Officially; Bobby W.soles, Ind. & Officially; Robert Ford, Ind. & Officially;mary Sue Terry, Ind. & Officially; Jacqueline G. Epps, Ind.& Officially; James E. Kulp, Ind. & Officially, Defendants-appellees, 838 F.2d 466 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseEmjumo A. Kenyatta, pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion, jurisdiction premised under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), discloses that this appeal from the magistrate's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Kenyatta v. Murray, C/A 86-562-R (E.D. Va., Nov. 3, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
