Geoffrey M. Baynard, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Humanservices, Defendant- Appellee, 838 F.2d 465 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseGeoffrey M. Baynard, pro se.
Deborah Fitzgerald, Office of the General Counsel, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order accepting the magistrate's recommendation and affirming the final decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Baynard v. Bowen, C/A No. 86-0444 (E.D. Va., Mar. 23, 1987).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
