Unpublished Dispositionfrank Hulen and Wilma Lesnansky, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Earlene Polyak, Defendant-appellant, 837 F.2d 475 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 837 F.2d 475 (6th Cir. 1988) Jan. 19, 1988

Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Judge.


ORDER

This pro se defendant appeals a judgment of the district court which remanded a civil action concerning real property to a Tennessee state court after she had previously sought its removal to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443. Defendant now moves for the stay of an order of the state court directing the sale of real property pending disposition of this appeal. upon review of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

For the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order of September 29, 1987, the motion for a stay is hereby denied and the final judgment entered October 5, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.