Otto Bintz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jeryl W. Riddick, Sr., G.d. Monola, James B. Oliver, Websterm. Chandler, Walter P. Conrad, Peter M. Meredith,defendants-appellees, 836 F.2d 1342 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseOtto Bintz, appellant pro se.
Philip Richard Trapani, City Attorney, Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bintz v. Riddick, C/A No. 87-172-N (E.D. Va. May 29, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
