Unpublished Dispositiongeorge Eli Wright, Petitioner-appellant, v. Billy W. Compton, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 835 F.2d 880 (6th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In these consolidated appeals, this pro se petitioner seeks review of a judgment of the district court which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner now moves for the provision of a transcript at government expense. Upon review of the record and the briefs filed by the parties, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
For the reasons stated in the magistrate's report and recommendation, which was adopted by the district court, the district court's final judgment entered October 30, 1986, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Furthermore, the motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense is hereby denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.