Lynn B. Kendle; Paula A. Kendle, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Richard E. Lyng, in His Official Capacity As Secretary Ofthe United States Department of Agriculture; Milton Hertz,in His Official Capacity As Acting Administrator of Theagricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service of Theunited States Department of Agriculture, Defendants-appellees, 829 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 829 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1987) Argued July 30, 1987. Decided September 4, 1987

Jack Lawrence Benoit Gohn (H. Russell Smouse; Melnicove, Kaufman, Weiner, Smouse & Garbis, P.A., on brief), for appellants.

Terrence Garry Jackson, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Agriculture (Breckinridge L. Willcox, United States Attorney; Joyce K. McKee, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief), for appellees.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


After plaintiffs' offer to slaughter or export their dairy herd, made pursuant to the Dairy Termination Program, 7 U.S.C. § 1146, was accepted, they sought to avoid their contract. The district court denied them injunctive relief and we affirm.

However sympathetic we may be to their change of mind, we perceive no basis on which to permit them to avoid the contract. The documents they signed were not ambiguous; there was no mutual mistake; their offer as to price was a fair one and reflected the market; they were not improperly induced to contract; there was no basis on which they could reasonably believe that their offer was revocable after acceptance; the contract is not unconscionable.*  Under such circumstances, we must reject their request that there be an evidentiary exploration of their state of mind when they submitted their bid.

AFFIRMED.

 *

Plaintiffs are to be paid the sum of $344,000 over a five-year period. While they are prohibited from producing or permitting others to produce milk during that period, they are free to put their land and equipment to other farm uses

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.