Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Petitioner-appellant, v. David A. Garraghty, Warden, Respondent-appellee.peter Emmanuel Bernard, Petitioner-appellant, v. David A. Garraghty, Warden, Attorney General of the State Ofvirginia, Robert H. Anderson, Iii, Assistantattorney General, Respondents-appellees, 829 F.2d 34 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CasePeter Emmanuel Bernard, appellant pro se.
Robert Homer Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
Before ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals from its orders refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 are without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny certificates of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Garraghty, C/A No. 86-730-R (E.D. Va., Mar. 31, 1987); Bernard v. Garraghty, C/A No. 86-729-R (E.D. Va., Mar. 30, 1987).
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
