United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Raymond Nottingham, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 828 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseRaymond Nottingham, Jr., appellant pro se.
Tommy Eugene Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Nottingham appeals from the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 'Motion for Reconsideration.' No aspect of the district court's initial judgment is before us for review. We can reverse the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion only if the denial amounts to an abuse of discretion. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). We find no abuse of discretion, and affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because it would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
