Albert C. Burgess, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Equilink Corporation, Brown Group Recreation Products, Inc.,king-seeley Thermos Company, Winning Ways, Inc.,william Iselin Co., Inc., Defendants-appellees,the Colgate Palmolive Company, Medalist Industries, Inc.,bike Athletic Company, Defendants, 828 F.2d 17 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseAlbert C. Burgess, appellant pro se.
Francis Marion Fletcher, Jr., Harkey, Fletcher, Lambeth & Nystrom, for appellees Equilink, Winning Ways, William Iselin Co., Colgate Palmolive, Medalist Industries and Bike Athletic.
Dan T. Coenen, Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, PA, for appellee Brown Group Recreation.
John Malcolm Murchison, Jr., Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, for appellee King-Seeley Thermos.
Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order denying leave to amend and dismissing plaintiff's complaint as time-barred is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Burgess v. Equilink Corporation, C/A No. 86-455-P (W.D.N.C., Feb. 5, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
