Ronald Graham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael C. Samberg, Patricia Johnson, G. Hinkle, Garymckinsely, B. Eggleston, Sgt. Guy, Sgt. Richardson, Sgt.running, Lt. Parker, Major Lawman, Officer Whitfield,officer Bullock, Officer Town, Mr. Grise, Commissarymanager, D.e. Groome, Mrs. Resnick, Mrs. Kafka, Lt. Hubbard,officer Gray, Counselor Young, Officer L. Sim, Lt. Hendrick,defendant-appellee, 828 F.2d 17 (4th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 828 F.2d 17 (4th Cir. 1987) Submitted May 28, 1987. Decided August 18, 1987

Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.

Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Samberg, C/A No. 86-515-R (E.D. Va., Mar. 16, 1987).

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.