Richard Peamon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Krugsburg, Defendant-appellee, 826 F.2d 1060 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseRichard Peamon, appellant pro se.
John Henry Lewin, Jr., Venable, Baetjer & Howard; Peter Chatilovicz, Deborah A. Folloni, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Peamon v. Krugsburg, C/A No. 86-3376 (D. Md., Feb. 19, 1987).
We deny the appellee's request for costs and attorney fees on appeal but note that the filing of frivolous appeals in the future may prompt the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Fed. R. App. P. 38.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
