Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Nathan Rice; Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of Northcarolina, Respondents-appellees, 826 F.2d 1060 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseVirgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr., appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny appellant's request for appointment of counsel, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sanderson v. Rice, C/A No. 84-79-HC; C/A No. 84-101-HC; C/A No. 84-78-HC (E.D.N.C., Feb. 27, 1987).
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
