Stanley A. Radvan-ziemnowicz, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Janina D. Ziemnowicz; Nancy R. Beiter; Linus H. Deeny;stanley B. Frosh, Jr.; Paul J. Mcgarvey; Williamr. Kearney; Donald N. Sperling;christopher H. Ziemnowicz,defendant-appellee, 826 F.2d 1060 (4th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 826 F.2d 1060 (4th Cir. 1987) Submitted May 28, 1987. Decided Aug. 6, 1987

Stanley A. Radvan-Ziemnowicz, Appellant pro se.

Janina D. Ziemnowicz, Nancy R. Beitner, Linus H. Deeny, Stanley B. Frosh, Jr., Paul J. McGarvey, Donald N. Sperling, Christopher H. Ziemnowicz, William R. Kearney, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing plaintiff's complaint as frivolous is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Radvan-Ziemnowicz v. Ziemnowicz, C/A No. 86-3644-B, (D. Md., Jan. 12, 1987).

AFFIRMED.