Henry C. Meyer, et al., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellees.mary Ellen Jenkins, et al., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellees.anona Belisle, et al., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellees, 820 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBrent M. Rosenthal, Russell W. Budd and Janice Robinson, Dallas, Tex., Clark Gasser, Pocatello, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Christopher Burke, Boise, Idaho, for defendants-appellees.
Before FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment is vacated.* The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether the actions are timely under Davis v. Moran, 112 Idaho 703, 735 P.2d 1014 (1987) and, if not, whether the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 9658 are applicable.
The district court's opinion appears at 643 F. Supp. 17 (D. Idaho 1985)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
