Unpublished Dispositionardie Lightner, Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Respondent-appellee, 818 F.2d 866 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 818 F.2d 866 (6th Cir. 1987) May 18, 1987

Before KEITH, KENNEDY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

This pro se petitioner appeals an order of the district court which denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition.

It is ORDERED that the district court's judgment be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.