United States of America, Defendant-appellee v. W. Garland Nealy, Plaintiff-appellant, 818 F.2d 30 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore WIDENER, HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
W. Garland Nealy, appellant pro se.
Mary Stanley Feinberg, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that courts order denying Nealy's Rule 35(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, motion to correct an illegal sentence is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Nealy v. United States, CR No. 82-20036 (S.D.W. Va., Mar. 12, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
