Gerald S. Kemp, Appellant, v. Steven Bernstein, Deputy; Paul Birch, Deputy; Darryllewis, Deputy Sheriff; C. Joseph, Deputy Sheriff; Jamesjames, Deputy; and Liam O'grady, Attorney, in Theirofficial and Individual Capacities, Appellees, 818 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 818 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1987) Submitted Feb. 24, 1987. Decided April 27, 1987

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Gerald S. Kemp, appellant pro se.

Gerald L. Baliles, Attorney General; Claude M. Hilton; Leo R. Andrews, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM:


Gerald S. Kemp appeals from the district court's denial of relief under Fed. R. Civ. P . 60 (b) . The district court found that the arguments raised in Kemp's Rule 60(b) motion did not warrant disturbing the judgment entered against him. We agree and accordingly find neither error nor abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively and affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.