Unpublished Dispositionsharon S. Brooks; Victor Mehozonek; Franklin D. Novak;kazmier E. Wasilewski; Clifton Whigham,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Ford Motor Company; William Landers, Mfg. Mgr.; Lawrencefain; Randy Dougal; George Vanhaezenbrouck; Thomasnugent; City of Brookpark, Ohio; Thomas A. Dease, Chief Ofpolice; Timothy O'rourke, Lt., Defendants-appellees, 815 F.2d 76 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 815 F.2d 76 (6th Cir. 1987) Feb. 5, 1987

Before KENNEDY, JONES and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This matter has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Plaintiffs appeal from a district court judgment which dismissed their 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 complaint. The complaint was filed four years after the date of accrual.

Upon review of the district court record and the briefs submitted on appeal, this Court concludes that the district court correctly dismissed plaintiffs' complaint. See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261 (1985); Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 106 S. Ct. 2902 (1986).

Therefore, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(d) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.