Unpublished Dispositionwilliam Solis Vargas, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Arnold R. Jago, et al., Defendants-appellees, 812 F.2d 1409 (6th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore RYAN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the brief and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff seeks redress for injuries allegedly suffered at the hands of defendants in 1974. This action, not commenced until June 24, 1983, was dismissed as untimely by the district court. Plaintiff appealed. On appeal, appellees move to dismiss for failure to file timely objections to the magistrate's report. Plaintiff has submitted an appellate brief.
Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court in its opinion below. Rule 9(d) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
It is therefore ORDERED that the motion be denied and that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
