Wayne E. Wham, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 812 F.2d 1402 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Wayne E. Wham, appellant pro se.
Robert Steven Pomerance, Michael Lee Paup, Roger Milton Olsen, United States Department of Justice; Jean Owens, Internal Revenue Service, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the Tax Court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order assessing a deficiency is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny appellant's motion for stay, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the Tax Court. Wham v. Commissioner, Tax Court No. 10680-83 (Dec. 26, 1985 and April 23, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
