John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bell & Howell, Defendant-appellee, 810 F.2d 1517 (9th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseRobert F. Koehler, Jr., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, John R. Reese, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.
The opinion, filed November 6, 1986, 803 F.2d 1473 is modified as set forth following.
Insert on page 1478 second column line 17 of 803 F.2d before Nonetheless: "It will thus be rare for a court to infer a vertical combination solely from a business's unilateral refusal to deal with distributors or customers who do not comply with certain conditions."
Delete on page 1478 second column second line from bottom: "necessary to show a combination between himself and B & H" and replace with "necessary to infer a vertical combination from a unilateral refusal to deal."
All petitions to file amicus briefs are denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
