Reginald Lee, Appellant, v. David Queen, U.S. Attorney; Paul Falconer, U.S. Chiefprobation Officer, in Their Individual Andofficial Capacities, Appellee, 806 F.2d 257 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, District Judge. (C/A No. 86-342-H)
Reginald Lee, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record from the district court's opinion disclosed that this appeal from its order dismissing appellant Lee's complaint is without merit. Lee has not presented any evidence that the parole board would rely on the discredited allegations. Bloodgood v. Garraghty, 783 F.2d 470 (4th Cir. 1986). Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Queen, C/A No. 86-342-H (D. Md., July 25, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
