James Collins, Executor of the Estate of Rebecca Collins,deceased, and James Collins, Individually, Appellee, v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Appellant, 806 F.2d 257 (4th Cir. 1986)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 806 F.2d 257 (4th Cir. 1986) Argued Oct. 9, 1986. Decided Dec. 4, 1986

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (C/A 84-3374)

R. Carter Elkins (Campbell, Woods, Bagley, Emerson, McNeer & Herndon on brief), for appellant.

John Bicknell (Menis E. Ketchum; Greene, Ketchum, Bailey & Twell; George D. Beter on brief), for appellee.

S.D.W. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, ERVIN, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Plaintiff James Collins obtained a jury verdict of $21,146.59 against defendant, Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company, on a claim for health insurance benefits under a sickness and accident policy insuring the now-deceased Rebecca Collins. The terms of the policy issued to the insured excluded coverage for illness manifested during the first thirty days that the policy was in force, and in fact the insured's illness first manifested itself within that thirty-day period. Plaintiff recovered, however, on the ground that the defendant was estopped from denying coverage under the insurance policy because of the oral representations of its insurance agent and the written representations in some of its promotional literature. Defendant appeals, contending that plaintiff could not properly recover under a theory of estoppel. We see no merit in the defendant's contention, and we affirm.

The testimony, although controverted, if believed was legally sufficient to support the jury's finding of estoppel, and the written representations could reasonably be understood to form the basis for estoppel. The evidence was also legally sufficient to support a finding that the claimant relied to her detriment on the representations by paying insurance premiums and by terminating her efforts adequately to insure herself.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.