Raymond E. Stokes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dr. Beorn; Mr. Welch; R.m. Landon, Director; W.p. Rogers,warden; Charles Robb, Governor; C.e. Havener; M. Price;j.a. Bates; C. Henderson; T.c. Richtmyer; R.m. Muncy;w.f. Johnston; John Taylor; R.g. Spann, Defendants-appellees, 805 F.2d 393 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseRaymond Stokes, appellant pro se.
Michael A. Likavec, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (C/A No. 84-0330-R)
Before PHILLIPS, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Stokes v. Beorn, C/A No. 84-0330-R (E.D. Va., July 11, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
