Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd., Appellant, v. M/v American Legend, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Unitedstates Lines, Inc., Appellees, 804 F.2d 837 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseJames D. Skeen (David W. Skeen, Constable, Alexander, Daneker & Skeen, on brief), for appellant.
John H. West, III (Roann Nichols, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, on brief), for appellees.
Before WINTER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.
PER CURIAM:
On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F.2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir. 1986) (dissenting opinion).
Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
