Elbert Hicks, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Appellee, 804 F.2d 677 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseElbert Hicks, appellant pro se.
Heidi M. Solomon, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from that Court's order denying a writ of mandamus is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. United States Postal Service, C/A No. 84-3177-15 (D.S.C., Sept. 20, 1985).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
