Samuel Theodore Wright, Plaintiff - Appellant v. Iva Purdy, Clerk, Defendant - Appellee, 803 F.2d 714 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseBefore RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
(Samuel Theodore Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy F. Garrett, Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, for Appellee.)
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Purdy, C/A No. 85-878-R (E.D. Va., June 3, 1986).*
We affirm the judgment below without prejudice to petitioner's right to renew his motion in the event there is a habeas petition
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.