Henry H. Craighead, Appellant, v. Brotherhood of Railway Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freighthandlers, Express and Station Employees, Appellees, 803 F.2d 1180 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseHenry H. Craighead, appellant pro se.
Gary E. Tegenkamp, Woodward, Fox, Wooten & Hart, and Joseph Guerrieri, Jr., Guerrieri & Sweeney, P.C., for appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action is without merit.* Because the dispositive issues recently have been determined authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Craighead v. Brotherhood of Railway Airline and Steamship Clerks, C/A No. 84-0971 (W.D. Va., Nov. 27, 1985).
AFFIRMED.
We agree with the district court that Henry H. Craighead failed to exhaust available union remedies and that therefore his claims under 29 U.S.C. § 412 are foreclosed
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
