George Lee Hinton, Appellant, v. Arresting K-9 Officer, Appellee, 802 F.2d 451 (4th Cir. 1986)
Annotate this CaseGeorge Lee Hinton, appellant pro se.
Philip R. Trapani, Harold J. Turen, City Attorney's Office, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and HALL,L Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. 5 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Hinton v. Arresting K-9 Officer, C/A No. 85-174-N (E.D. Va., March 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
